The Argument Of Entitlement And Desert - 1974 Words

In this paper I will defend John Arthur’s argument of entitlement and desert against Peter Singer’s theory of our duty to the global poor. We as privileged citizens, living in a prosperous country, do have some responsibility to help the tens of thousands of children under the age of 5 who die everyday from starvation and treatable disease. It seems natural that we as citizens of a first world country have a duty to help the global poor through charity. However that â€Å"duty† is vague and is under heavy moral debate. We as privileged citizens, living in a prosperous country, do have some responsibility to help the global poor. However, this rightful duty should not necessarily live up to the extreme and overwhelming expectations of Peter Singer. John Arthur’s argument of entitlement and desert is more realistic, logical, and more applicable to the world we live in today. Peter Singer’s central idea focuses around how grim death and suffering from lack of food, shelter and medical care really is. He further argues that if we can prevent something this unfortunate from happening, without sacrificing anything morally significant, we ought to do it. In other words, as privileged citizens, we ought to prevent all of the death and suffering that we can from lack of food, shelter and medical care from happening by giving our money and resources to charity (Chao, 2016, in-class discussion). In the terms of this argument, death and suffering from poverty are preventable with theShow MoreRelatedEssay on Discussing the Obligation to Help the Absolutely Poor828 Words   |  4 Pagesanswering this difficult question. To begin a comparative analysis of these theories, I will first go over the ideas that Singer represents in Rich and Poor, going on to analyze what Rachels and Nozick would say in response to Singers argument. In Rich and Poor, Singers basic principle is that when something is within ones power to prevent anything very bad from happening, without sacrificing anything of comparable moral significance, one ought to do so. He uses theRead MoreSummary Of Peter Singer s Argument1438 Words   |  6 PagesIn this paper I will discuss Peter Singer’s argument that it is our duty to aid to those in need, and John Arthur’s argument that we have competitive intuitions that have precedence over our duty to aid the needy. I will then argue that Arthur’s argument is more applicable to human kind as a species, simply due to the fact that human instinct is not capable of fulfilling Singer’s premise. Peter Singer argues that people who live in wealthier countries have an obligation to change their way of lifeRead MoreFamine, Affluence and Morality by Peter Singer1486 Words   |  6 PagesIn his own essay â€Å"Famine, Affluence and Morality†, Peter Singer puts forth some compelling arguments for affluent people to give what they have in excess, to the suffering people of the world. Before any criticism is made, here is the argument: - There are people suffering and dying from lack of food, shelter and medical care. - People suffering and dying from lack of food, shelter and medical care is bad. - If you have the power to prevent something bad from happening without sacrificing †¨anythingRead MoreArgument Against The Death Penalty1247 Words   |  5 Pagessociety that is not willing to demand a life of somebody who has taken somebody else’s life is simply immoral.† When considering the issue of capital punishment, many arguments are made in favor of proponents and abolitionists. There are utilitarian arguments, retributive arguments, and egalitarian arguments. Utilitarian arguments argue against the death penalty, for they look to punish criminals for the benefit and the â€Å"lesson learned† from the punishment. They believe that this is the most effectiveRead MoreThe Case For Death Penalty1252 Words   |  6 Pagessociety that is not willing to demand a life of somebody who has taken somebody else’s life is simply immoral.† When considering the issue of capital punishment, many arguments are made in favor of proponents and abolitionists. There are utilitarian arguments, retributive arguments, and egalitarian arguments. Utilitarian arguments argue against the death penalty, for they look to punish criminals for the benefit and the â€Å"lesson learned† from the punishment. They believe that this is the most effectiveRead More Illegal Immigration Essays1289 Words   |  6 Pagesother biased groups. If illegal immigration stays its present course the American tax-payer will continue to fund the well being of individuals who have broken federal rules and regulations and are being supported by law abiding citizens. This argument is not about individual rights to live and prosper. It is not about race or discrimination of any sort. It is only about the effects on health care that I am addressing. California has been plagued by budget deficiencies in recent years. LayoffsRead MorePrivatization And Deregulation Of Privatization1680 Words   |  7 Pagesgovernment institutions that the private sector seeks to privatize. A main argument for the privatization of this sector is that the public educational system has deteriorated. As noted by Friedman (1995), privatization is the only way to successfully improve the American educational system, as this â€Å"will provide a wide variety of learning opportunities and offer effective competition to public schools† (p. 1). In his argument for privatization, Friedman (1995) calls for a high-quality and universalRead More The Justification of Reverse Discrimination in Hiring Essay1580 Words   |  7 Pagesbecomes unnecessary. James Rachels bases his moral reasoning for reverse discrimination on what people deserve. Although he is conscious that reverse discrimination appears unfair to those directly affected, he proposes that fairness is dependent on desert. What an individual deserves lies on the effort and willpower for achievement (3. Rachels, CC2011, p 0201). Therefore, it is morally acceptable to execute preferential treatment towards a deserving individual if he or she put in more effort. Rachels’Read MoreThe Barbarian Nurseries Essay1186 Words   |  5 Pageshad an internal struggle with defining who she was, he is trying to understand the best route for his situation. Araceli not only goes through internal battles she also battles the justice system because of the mistakes of others. When a brutal argument between Scott and Maureen becomes heated and violent, the children are left in the care of Araceli. She struggles with what to do with the children. Her struggle with this begins when, â€Å"She stood with her arms folded and looked down the street, hopingRead MoreThe Filibuster1275 Words   |  6 Pagesleaving bills gridlocked in an oft-quarrelling Senate and slowing down imperative votes in favour of absolutely factional pick up (Roche, 1891). Dwindle Fenn, GOP advisor and previous Senate helper, called delays the oppression of the minority. Arguments for keeping, modifying, or ending the filibuster Keeping filibuster has some benefits especially to the minority group in the assembly and hence conservatives should kind off preserve filibuster. According to R-Neb, it encourages cool debating and