Ethical behavior Essay Example for Free

Ethical behavior Essay One of the primary rules of conduct in the medical profession is â€Å"First, do no harm,† and it is upon this directive that most matters of ethics in medicine can be grounded. Ethical behavior rests on this principle. It is the norm and is what is expected from all doctors and nurses. For instance, providing a patient with all relevant information to enable him to make an informed decision on whether to undergo surgery or not is considered ethical and proper. Most unethical behavior, on the other hand, stems from a desire for profit, although the actual participants (nurses, in particular) in an unethical act may only be taking part to preserve their job. A blatant (although unlikely) example of unethical behavior in a doctor would be the performance of surgery while under the influence of alcohol or another substance that adversely affects mental functions. Another is the recommendation and performance of unnecessary surgery (where simpler treatments would have sufficed) for extra profit. For many doctors and nurses, committing ethical or unethical acts is partly a matter of conforming to their organization’s rules. Ethical dilemmas relate directly to the organizational effectiveness of the system of doctors and nurses who work together—participation in ethical and unethical acts has a direct bearing on the efficiency of this system. In the case of routine circumcision, for example, a doctor may choose to continue encouraging new parents to get their babies circumcised because it would mean extra profit, in spite of the misgivings of his fellow doctors. However, it is not only the â€Å"cooperative† aspect of ethical and unethical behavior that is significant. Even if all members of an organization agree to cooperate in unethical behavior, an awareness of the â€Å"unethicality† of their actions can leave a seriously negative impression on the organization’s members, which could adversely affect their performance and thus render the organization much less than optimally efficient. It would therefore be towards the benefit of an organization to abide by practices that are generally considered ethical.

The Importance of Winning Essay -- Personal Narrative

The Importance of Winning There is an old saying â€Å" It doesn’t matter if you win or lose, it’s how you play the game.† How true is this? Can this be applied to all situations in life? This may be pertinent to children in schools who participate in trivial events such as sports, for example. However, with these types of ideas we are saying that losing is fine. Consequently, youths are goaded to contend with the ideas of being losers and also-rans. In events such as sports, politics, and even war, the old saying should be paraphrased to â€Å"It does matter if you win or lose and how you win.† Winning or losing can be a matter of life and death. Today’s professional sports players are so responsible for the team that they know they have to play at their best, with one hundred percent effort. Otherwise, the consequences are some times fatal for the fans and players as well. For instance, at the U.S. Soccer World Cup of 1994, the national team of Colombia was playing against the U.S. to qualify for the second round. One defender from the Colombian team, Andres Escobar Gomez, in an effort to kick the ball out of the terrain, accidentally kicked it into the goal of his team. The opposite team jeered the auto-goal because the victory for the U.S. was eminent. The Colombian fans were so angry that when the team went back to Colombia, the soccer player who scored the auto-goal was murdered two days later by radical fans. This is just a tragic example of how important it is to win. ...

Art History Paper Essay

Define the transformations that have taken place between the sculpture of the late archaic period and that of the early Classical period. Note how these imply a change in relationship of the viewer to the work of art. Throughout history, sculptures have developed significantly. The Western tradition of sculptures began in Ancient Greece along with Egypt and many other ancient civilizations around the world. Greece is widely seen as producing great masterpieces in the archaic period and as time evolved into the classical period more detailed and sensible artwork developed. During the archaic period (c.660-480 B.C.) sculpture emerged as a principal form of artistic expression. The beginning of this period marks posh and elegant statues of nude walking youths, the Kouroi, which suggest Egyptian prototypes but which are distinctive in stylization and force of movement. These sculptures were luxurious and prominent during this period of time. In the early classical, or transitional, period (c.480-450 B.C.) a new humanism started to find its artistic expression in terms of a perfect balance between authenticity and abstraction of form. By humanism I mean, a new culture of work developed. This work of art brought forward a greater amount of human qualities. For example, The Anavysos Kouros sculpture from century 540 – 515 B.C. and Kritios Boy from century 480 B.C. These two sculptures convey drastically different messages to the viewer while still portraying similar representations. The Kroisos Kouros is a statue of an Athenian solider that functioned as a grave marker, located in Anavysos in Attica. The marble Kritios Boy belongs to the Early Classical period of ancient Greek sculpture. Two similar sculptures can portray extremely different messages to the viewer by the sculptures body language and the amount of detail put into the sculpture. The way the sculpture is portrayed can impact the viewer’s emotion toward the selected art. The sculpture of Anavysos Kouros during century 540 – 515 B.C. was constructed with an inorganic semblance. The Anavysos Kouros is thought to represent the ideal image of a person rather than an actual portrayal of what Kroisos looked like. This makes Anavysos Kouros understood to be as an abstract figure due to the fact that it’s related to the function of a statue while still representing a hero of Greek culture. The pose of the Kouros, a clear and simple formula, derives from Egyptian art and was used by Greek sculptors for more than a hundred years. The formula consists of the statue frontal fixed with the left food leading slightly. His arms are held next to the body, and the fists are grasped with the thumbs forward. The Greek sculptor rendered the human body in a far more naturalistic manner. For example, the head is no longer too large for the body, and the face is more rounded, with puffy cheeks replacing the flat planes of the earlier work. The long hair does not form an inflexible backdrop to the head but falls naturally over the back. His knees are locked, hips are in axis with shoulders which convey that they body’s muscles are independent from the body’s movement. This statue for example is frozen in time. Rounded hips replace the V-shaped ridges of the earlier work. Anavysos Kouros is extremely stiff even though the statue is free from a block that some statues are attached to from behind. Statues like this replaced the large vases of Geometric times as the favored form of grave marker in the sixth century BCE. This Greek statue from the archaic period, Anavysos Kouros, is produced in frontal view, which is common in regard to this period. Typical Archaic sculptures are produced to be very frontal and have the archaic smile on its face. Anavysos Kouros has both of these descriptions. The art work’s body language would portray the sculpture to convey no emotion but with the archaic smile represented on it’s face the viewer may become confused due to the inconsistent body language. The body looks as if it is very light but still has extremely large muscles that are tensed which also back up the argument that it’s unnatural. The statue should be in motion due to the one leg in front of the other but the statue is portrayed as frozen which makes it extremely mechanical. On the other hand, the Kritios Boy Statue from century 480 B.C. is much more organic with a more fluid body stance. Never before had a sculptor been concerned with depicting how a human being, as opposed to a stone image, actually stands. Real people do not stand in the stiff form of the kouroi and korai. Humans shift their weight and the region of the main body parts around the vertical but flexible axis of the spine. The muscular and skeletal structures are depicted with freely lifelike accuracy, with the rib cage naturally expanded as if in the act of breathing, with a collected and calm demeanor and hips, which are distinctly narrower. The artist of this image was the first to grasp this fact and represent it in statuary. The head also turns slightly to the right and tilts, breaking the unwritten rule of frontality dictating the form of virtually all-earlier statues. As a final forebear of the classical period, the â€Å"smile† of archaic statues has been completely replaced by the accurate delivery of the lips and the formal expression that characterized the transitional austere style. The function of this statue is to recognize accomplishment not from a specific person but represents the ideal type. This statue shows contrapposto with his knee popped and bent showing some type of motion, which is the introduction of weight shift in a statue. Contrapposto separates Classical from Archaic Greek statuary. Kritios Boy’s muscles work interdependently with the axis of his body, he looks as if he is in motion due to the muscles being engaged, as there is a potential of movement. After comparing both artworks in the archaic time period and the classical, most viewers are likely to be able to connect with the classical artwork rather than early time periods’. People today show favoritism to sculptures that resemble the human body and it’s characteristics. Kritios Boy shows more humanistic concepts than the sculpture of Anavysos Kouros. The sculpture’s time period changes the relationship of the sculpture to the viewer. Viewers make emotional connections with statues due to their body language. Kritios Boy has interdependent muscles and is more matter-of-fact. Transformations of a sculpture and time periods have a great deal of impact on the viewer.

Legal Brief - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1425 Downloads: 1 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Law Essay Type Argumentative essay Tags: Competition Essay Did you like this example? THE LEGAL BRIEF AND ANALYSIS OF THE CASE LAW FEHR vs ALGARDS Citation N.J.Super.A.D.,2011. Fehr v. Algard Not Reported in A.3d, 2011 WL 13670 (N.J.Super.A.D.) Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Legal Brief" essay for you Create order UNPUBLISHED OPINION. CHECK COURT RULES BEFORE CITING. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Edward FEHR, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. George E. ALGARD, Jr., Cathy Algard, Sterling Harbor Motel Marina, Inc. t/a Sterling Harbor Bait Tackle, Sterling Harbor Duke of Fluke Tournament, Defendants-Appellants. Argued: Oct. 6, 2010. Decided: Jan. 5, 2011. Before Judges: AXELRAD and LIHOTZ. PER CURIAM. Brief Facts or Merits of the Case Cathy Algard and her spouse George Algard were the holders of Sterling Harbor Motel and Marina. Consistently they support a competition by the name Sterling Harbor Duke of Fluke Tournament. In this competition, there were diverse classifications and distinctive prizes for every classification. The two most celebrated prizes of the competition are: Single heaviest Fluke Prize: this prize is granted to the contender who gets the heaviest fluke live. Five Heaviest Fluke Prize: this prize is granted to the watercraft with four hopefuls who can get five fishes that when joined have the heaviest weight. Each member to the competition was given a competition handout in which a few controls alongside an enrollment structure are specified. The guidelines in the pamphlet were: Any watercraft approaching from another vessel, structure or area was denied from tht competition Entrance expenses and enrollment due date Tournament beginning time and angling ranges furthermore the time of last weigh- in A few tenets were just for the Five Heaviest Fluke Prize and the Single heaviest Fluke Prize: Catching fish on a bar or reel Four fishermen were permitted on a watercraft with one pole for every fisher All hopefuls on the watercraft needed to get a fish For the heaviest single fluke classification, fish got must be alive Same fish cant be submitted for the single heaviest fluke and five heaviest fluke classification. The last and most dominant rule was: All fishes will be analyzed inside and remotely by the judges and on the off chance that they discovered a fish bearing suspicious stamping it will be excluded promptly. Judges choice would be the last one. Alongside the enrollment structure there was an announcement which expressed that all the standards have been perused by the chief before marking the agreement and in the event that on wrong data commander alongside plaintiff will be disqualified. There were three judges in the competition of 2007, George Algard, Cathy Algard (owners) and Kenneth Greenling, which was held in wildwood. Offended partys vessel was registerd for the competition by Jack Aydelotte. Aydelotte offered fishes in two classifications. Firstly in the single heaviest fluke recompense he offered a wallow which weighed six pounds and four ounces and was acknowledged by. Second, he needed to enter in Dutchess recompense classification which was for female fisher so he entered the five heaviest fluke honor and submitted five fishes. At the point when judges analyzed the fishes they pronounced that two fishes were in such a terrible shape, to the point that they were completely inadmissible. They were smooth w hite, offensive, tan, depressed eyes, thus they excluded Aydelotte from the competition. Aydelotte contended that he got the fishes upon the arrival of competition yet was not able to give any clarification about the state of fishes. At the time of honors, the six pond flop by Aydelotte was the heaviest fish in the single heaviest fluke classification however being precluded that prize was given to another person. Along these lines, Aydelotte (offended party) documented a suit against the Algards for break in contract. Seeing the circumstances court ruled for Aydelotte and delegated him the Duke of Fluke 2007. Algards documented a bid and contended that this choice was not right and that Aydelotte conned in the competition by submitting a fish that was not gotten upon the arrival of competition in the five heaviest fluke classification. They additionally contend that all the standards of the competition in the pamphlet were clear and in justifiable dialect and it was composed obviously that false data will prompt exclusion. The Legal Issue to be resolved Did offended party take after the guidelines of the competition which as indicated by offended party he did. Offended party contended that he got the heaviest fluke in the single heaviest fluke classification and still he wasnt given the prize. Court concurs on this and says that there was lead on exclusion of fish and not the commander. The protectors Cathy and George contend that ità ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s a reasonable tricking which prompts exclusion. They likewise contend that all agreement are bound by the great confidence and reasonable dealings understanding and after this Aydelotte was excluded from the competition. Decision or Ruling of the Court under Jurisdiction of the Case Choice of the court is focused around: Rule 12 in the pamphlet was about the terrible fish and warns contend that perusing the guidelines of the competition it was clear that accommodation of awful fish will p rompt exclusion. In this point ità ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s composed that there will be exclusion if fish and not of the individual. In any case it in the enrollment portion there was an announcement which said that falsehood will prompt preclusion. As indicated by shields lying about the fish is incorporated in giving wrong data along these lines they rightly excluded Aydelotte. The understanding of great confidence and reasonable dealings is available in all agreement along these lines it was in the agreement of competition. In all the agreement ità ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s a prerequisite that all the gatherings are fair to one another. On the off chance that we see that activities of offended party, he lied about the awful fish and guaranteed that he got it that day which brings up that he was not legit with the judges. He ruptured the agreement and hence was precluded. Plaintiff additionally contended that in the competition pamphlets it was not specified that on account of conning, the re will be quick preclusion. This contention by offended party was not considered as he disregarded the most essential understanding of great confidence and reasonable dealings. Also, cheating in any occasion can prompt exclusion this was self caught on. Offended party additionally recommended to the court that considering the position of the protectors it is simple for them to change principles of competition. This contention was not considered by the court. The choice of the court was not in the support of offended party and it reasoned that the activities of offended party brings up that he was attempting to trick and trap the judges by showing them a terrible fish in a condition that was unexplainable furthermore providing for them false data and breaking the great confidence and reasonable dealings assertion. Considering all the actualities that we have scholarly, court guarantees that offended party shouldnt be granted the Duke of Fluke. Reason or Legal Bases of the Deci sion As indicated by the laws it says that when the tenets and regulations of a challenge or competition are made accessible for the general population, the supporters really make an offer to the candidates and subsequently they ought to peruse all the principles altogether before marking the agreement. As once the agreement is marked, all the competitors are bound by the agreement. In the case close by, all the guidelines and regulations were clear and above all they were in a justifiable dialect and in basic terms. So contention about tenets was not considered by the court. In any case there was stand out missing point which ought to have been in the agreement that there was nothing specified about the outcomes of tricking and what will happen to the competitor who deceived. Furthermore, in every agreement there is an assertion of great confidence and reasonable dealings present and all the gatherings to the agreement are bound by it. As indicated by court, great confiden ce is the point at which the standard of group is not disregarded which requires both gatherings to be dependable to the agreement by being fair. For this situation, the offended party disregarded the understanding of great confidence by giving judges the terrible fish and was not able to give any reason furthermore if the offended party is permitted to win the single heaviest fluke prize then it wont be reasonable to all different hopefuls who played as per the assertion of great confidence and reasonable dealings. So these were the lawful premise of the choice of judges.